Sri Lanka vs Sweden: Fertilizers n.e.c. — Agricultural Use

Sri Lanka
0 t
in 2020
Sweden
0 t
in 2020
Sri Lanka rank
23rd
Sweden rank
23rd

Fertilizers n.e.c. — Agricultural Use over time

  • Sri Lanka
  • Sweden
02004006008001.0k201220162020

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Sweden, a difference of 0 t.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

Sri Lanka ranks 23rd and Sweden ranks 23rd of 29 countries.

Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sri Lanka Sweden Difference Ahead
2010s 462.6 t 0 t 462.6 t Sri Lanka
2020s 0 t 0 t 0 t

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fertilizers n.e.c. — agricultural use, Sri Lanka or Sweden?
Sri Lanka, at 0 t against 0 t in Sweden as of 2020.
What is the difference in fertilizers n.e.c. — agricultural use between Sri Lanka and Sweden?
0 t, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Sweden?
6 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2020.
How do Sri Lanka and Sweden rank globally for fertilizers n.e.c. — agricultural use?
Sri Lanka ranks 23rd and Sweden ranks 23rd of 29 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Fertilizers n.e.c. — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Fertilizers n.e.c. — Agricultural Use
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
29 places, 265 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf