El Salvador vs Kyrgyzstan: Fertilizers n.e.c. — Export quantity
Fertilizers n.e.c. — Export quantity over time
- El Salvador
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 7.06 t against 5.78 t in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 1.28 t.
That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.2 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2005 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 122nd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 124th of 150 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 343 t | 50.94 t | 292.06 t | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 246.47 t | 392.88 t | 146.41 t | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 16.7 t | 46.77 t | 30.07 t | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fertilizers n.e.c. — export quantity, El Salvador or Kyrgyzstan?
- El Salvador, at 7.06 t against 5.78 t in Kyrgyzstan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fertilizers n.e.c. — export quantity between El Salvador and Kyrgyzstan?
- 1.28 t, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Kyrgyzstan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do El Salvador and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for fertilizers n.e.c. — export quantity?
- El Salvador ranks 122nd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 124th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Fertilizers n.e.c. — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf