New Zealand vs Uzbekistan: Fertilizers n.e.c. — Export quantity
Fertilizers n.e.c. — Export quantity over time
- New Zealand
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 706.94 t against 569 t in Uzbekistan, a difference of 137.94 t.
That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.2 times Uzbekistan's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2009 it was New Zealand ahead.
New Zealand ranks 59th and Uzbekistan ranks 61st of 140 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, New Zealand averaged higher in 1 and Uzbekistan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 473.56 t | 2.04 t | 471.52 t | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 606.2 t | 2,595 t | 1,988 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 528.58 t | 12,280 t | 11,752 t | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fertilizers n.e.c. — export quantity, New Zealand or Uzbekistan?
- New Zealand, at 706.94 t against 569 t in Uzbekistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fertilizers n.e.c. — export quantity between New Zealand and Uzbekistan?
- 137.94 t, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Uzbekistan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2024.
- How do New Zealand and Uzbekistan rank globally for fertilizers n.e.c. — export quantity?
- New Zealand ranks 59th and Uzbekistan ranks 61st of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Fertilizers n.e.c. — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf