Barbados vs Eswatini: Fertilizers n.e.c. — Export value
Fertilizers n.e.c. — Export value over time
- Barbados
- Eswatini
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 28.84 1000 USD against 27.14 1000 USD in Eswatini, a difference of 1.7 1000 USD.
That makes Barbados's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Barbados ahead.
Barbados ranks 100th and Eswatini ranks 102nd of 139 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 1 and Eswatini in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 130.7 1000 USD | 138.09 1000 USD | 7.39 1000 USD | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 172.48 1000 USD | 59.73 1000 USD | 112.75 1000 USD | Barbados |
| 2020s | 19.88 1000 USD | 33.79 1000 USD | 13.92 1000 USD | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fertilizers n.e.c. — export value, Barbados or Eswatini?
- Barbados, at 28.84 1000 USD against 27.14 1000 USD in Eswatini as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fertilizers n.e.c. — export value between Barbados and Eswatini?
- 1.7 1000 USD, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Eswatini?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Barbados and Eswatini rank globally for fertilizers n.e.c. — export value?
- Barbados ranks 100th and Eswatini ranks 102nd of 139 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Fertilizers n.e.c. — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf