Afghanistan vs Cook Islands: Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import quantity
Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Afghanistan
- Cook Islands
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 69.5 t against 49.06 t in Cook Islands, a difference of 20.44 t.
That makes Afghanistan's figure about 1.4 times Cook Islands's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Afghanistan ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 180th and Cook Islands ranks 182nd of 203 countries.
Afghanistan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Cook Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4,824 t | 35.37 t | 4,789 t | Afghanistan |
| 2010s | 1,477 t | 46.39 t | 1,430 t | Afghanistan |
| 2020s | 1,535 t | 46.42 t | 1,489 t | Afghanistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fertilizers n.e.c. — import quantity, Afghanistan or Cook Islands?
- Afghanistan, at 69.5 t against 49.06 t in Cook Islands as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fertilizers n.e.c. — import quantity between Afghanistan and Cook Islands?
- 20.44 t, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Cook Islands?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
- How do Afghanistan and Cook Islands rank globally for fertilizers n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Afghanistan ranks 180th and Cook Islands ranks 182nd of 203 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf