Congo vs Saint Lucia: Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import quantity
Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Congo
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
Congo currently reports 603.34 t against 539.43 t in Saint Lucia, a difference of 63.91 t.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Saint Lucia's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Saint Lucia ahead.
Congo ranks 136th and Saint Lucia ranks 139th of 203 countries.
Saint Lucia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Saint Lucia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 630.92 t | 839.72 t | 208.8 t | Saint Lucia |
| 2010s | 624.18 t | 2,621 t | 1,996 t | Saint Lucia |
| 2020s | 348.2 t | 539.43 t | 191.23 t | Saint Lucia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fertilizers n.e.c. — import quantity, Congo or Saint Lucia?
- Congo, at 603.34 t against 539.43 t in Saint Lucia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fertilizers n.e.c. — import quantity between Congo and Saint Lucia?
- 63.91 t, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Saint Lucia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
- How do Congo and Saint Lucia rank globally for fertilizers n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Congo ranks 136th and Saint Lucia ranks 139th of 203 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf