Côte d'Ivoire vs Luxembourg: Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import quantity
Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Côte d'Ivoire
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Côte d'Ivoire currently reports 3,315 t against 2,811 t in Luxembourg, a difference of 504 t.
That makes Côte d'Ivoire's figure about 1.2 times Luxembourg's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 97th and Luxembourg ranks 100th of 203 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Côte d'Ivoire | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 101.92 t | 2,880 t | 2,778 t | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 2,800 t | 3,090 t | 289.7 t | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 1,783 t | 3,293 t | 1,509 t | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fertilizers n.e.c. — import quantity, Côte d'Ivoire or Luxembourg?
- Côte d'Ivoire, at 3,315 t against 2,811 t in Luxembourg as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fertilizers n.e.c. — import quantity between Côte d'Ivoire and Luxembourg?
- 504 t, with Côte d'Ivoire ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Luxembourg?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Côte d'Ivoire and Luxembourg rank globally for fertilizers n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Côte d'Ivoire ranks 97th and Luxembourg ranks 100th of 203 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf