Dominican Republic vs Zambia: Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import quantity
Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Dominican Republic
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 102,398 t against 88,163 t in Dominican Republic, a difference of 14,235 t.
That makes Zambia's figure about 1.2 times Dominican Republic's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Zambia ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 10th and Zambia ranks 7th of 203 countries.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,783 t | 35,286 t | 32,503 t | Zambia |
| 2010s | 16,716 t | 16,857 t | 140.83 t | Zambia |
| 2020s | 72,479 t | 78,187 t | 5,708 t | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fertilizers n.e.c. — import quantity, Dominican Republic or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 102,398 t against 88,163 t in Dominican Republic as of 2023.
- What is the difference in fertilizers n.e.c. — import quantity between Dominican Republic and Zambia?
- 14,235 t, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Zambia?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Dominican Republic and Zambia rank globally for fertilizers n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Dominican Republic ranks 10th and Zambia ranks 7th of 203 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf