Equatorial Guinea vs Samoa: Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import quantity
Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Samoa
How they compare
Samoa currently reports 9.72 t against 8.09 t in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 1.63 t.
That makes Samoa's figure about 1.2 times Equatorial Guinea's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Samoa ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 190th and Samoa ranks 188th of 203 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 184.77 t | 67.05 t | 117.73 t | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | 102.15 t | 50.01 t | 52.14 t | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2020s | 70.21 t | 34.1 t | 36.11 t | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fertilizers n.e.c. — import quantity, Equatorial Guinea or Samoa?
- Samoa, at 9.72 t against 8.09 t in Equatorial Guinea as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fertilizers n.e.c. — import quantity between Equatorial Guinea and Samoa?
- 1.63 t, with Samoa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Samoa?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Samoa rank globally for fertilizers n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 190th and Samoa ranks 188th of 203 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf