Eswatini vs Luxembourg: Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import quantity
Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Eswatini
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 3,466 t against 2,811 t in Luxembourg, a difference of 655 t.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.2 times Luxembourg's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 90th and Luxembourg ranks 93rd of 190 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Luxembourg in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 11,121 t | 2,880 t | 8,241 t | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 1,186 t | 3,090 t | 1,905 t | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 2,556 t | 3,413 t | 856.73 t | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fertilizers n.e.c. — import quantity, Eswatini or Luxembourg?
- Eswatini, at 3,466 t against 2,811 t in Luxembourg as of 2023.
- What is the difference in fertilizers n.e.c. — import quantity between Eswatini and Luxembourg?
- 655 t, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Luxembourg?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Eswatini and Luxembourg rank globally for fertilizers n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Eswatini ranks 90th and Luxembourg ranks 93rd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf