Ethiopia vs Luxembourg: Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import quantity
Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Ethiopia
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 2,811 t against 2,395 t in Ethiopia, a difference of 416 t.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.2 times Ethiopia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Ethiopia ranks 103rd and Luxembourg ranks 100th of 203 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Ethiopia averaged higher in 1 and Luxembourg in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,158 t | 2,880 t | 722.01 t | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 277,021 t | 3,090 t | 273,931 t | Ethiopia |
| 2020s | 2,846 t | 3,413 t | 566.4 t | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fertilizers n.e.c. — import quantity, Ethiopia or Luxembourg?
- Luxembourg, at 2,811 t against 2,395 t in Ethiopia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fertilizers n.e.c. — import quantity between Ethiopia and Luxembourg?
- 416 t, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Luxembourg?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Ethiopia and Luxembourg rank globally for fertilizers n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Ethiopia ranks 103rd and Luxembourg ranks 100th of 203 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf