Iceland vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import quantity
Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Iceland
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 108.08 t against 107.92 t in Iceland, a difference of 0.16 t.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Iceland ahead.
Iceland ranks 171st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 170th of 203 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 1 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 650.51 t | 87.1 t | 563.41 t | Iceland |
| 2010s | 32.05 t | 70.25 t | 38.19 t | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fertilizers n.e.c. — import quantity, Iceland or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 108.08 t against 107.92 t in Iceland as of 2017.
- What is the difference in fertilizers n.e.c. — import quantity between Iceland and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0.16 t, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2017.
- How do Iceland and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for fertilizers n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Iceland ranks 171st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 170th of 203 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf