Kiribati vs Solomon Islands: Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import quantity
Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Kiribati
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Solomon Islands currently reports 30.32 t against 18 t in Kiribati, a difference of 12.32 t.
That makes Solomon Islands's figure about 1.7 times Kiribati's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Solomon Islands has been ahead every year.
Kiribati ranks 175th and Solomon Islands ranks 173rd of 190 countries.
Solomon Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 t | 23.05 t | 23.05 t | Solomon Islands |
| 2010s | 0.8725 t | 19.27 t | 18.39 t | Solomon Islands |
| 2020s | 18 t | 37.6 t | 19.6 t | Solomon Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fertilizers n.e.c. — import quantity, Kiribati or Solomon Islands?
- Solomon Islands, at 30.32 t against 18 t in Kiribati as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fertilizers n.e.c. — import quantity between Kiribati and Solomon Islands?
- 12.32 t, with Solomon Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Solomon Islands?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2021.
- How do Kiribati and Solomon Islands rank globally for fertilizers n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Kiribati ranks 175th and Solomon Islands ranks 173rd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf