Lithuania vs Nicaragua: Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import quantity
Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Lithuania
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 13,602 t against 12,399 t in Lithuania, a difference of 1,203 t.
That makes Nicaragua's figure about 1.1 times Lithuania's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Nicaragua ahead.
Lithuania ranks 60th and Nicaragua ranks 59th of 203 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 1 and Nicaragua in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,648 t | 7,530 t | 4,882 t | Nicaragua |
| 2010s | 5,284 t | 24,349 t | 19,065 t | Nicaragua |
| 2020s | 18,642 t | 14,881 t | 3,761 t | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fertilizers n.e.c. — import quantity, Lithuania or Nicaragua?
- Nicaragua, at 13,602 t against 12,399 t in Lithuania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in fertilizers n.e.c. — import quantity between Lithuania and Nicaragua?
- 1,203 t, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Nicaragua?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Lithuania and Nicaragua rank globally for fertilizers n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Lithuania ranks 60th and Nicaragua ranks 59th of 203 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf