Papua New Guinea vs Türkiye: Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import quantity
Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Papua New Guinea
- Türkiye
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 19,597 t against 17,729 t in Türkiye, a difference of 1,868 t.
That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Türkiye's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Türkiye ahead.
Papua New Guinea ranks 46th and Türkiye ranks 48th of 203 countries.
Türkiye has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Papua New Guinea | Türkiye | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3,281 t | 3,972 t | 691.07 t | Türkiye |
| 2010s | 4,996 t | 14,270 t | 9,274 t | Türkiye |
| 2020s | 11,944 t | 18,154 t | 6,210 t | Türkiye |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fertilizers n.e.c. — import quantity, Papua New Guinea or Türkiye?
- Papua New Guinea, at 19,597 t against 17,729 t in Türkiye as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fertilizers n.e.c. — import quantity between Papua New Guinea and Türkiye?
- 1,868 t, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Türkiye?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Papua New Guinea and Türkiye rank globally for fertilizers n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 46th and Türkiye ranks 48th of 203 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf