Republic of Moldova vs Uganda: Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import quantity
Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Republic of Moldova
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 83,912 t against 1,910 t in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 82,002 t.
That makes Uganda's figure about 43.9 times Republic of Moldova's.
Across all 23 years both countries report, Uganda has been ahead every year.
Republic of Moldova ranks 8th and Uganda ranks 10th of 13 countries.
Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Republic of Moldova | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 307.24 t | 6,143 t | 5,836 t | Uganda |
| 2010s | 1,049 t | 24,890 t | 23,841 t | Uganda |
| 2020s | 2,330 t | 51,535 t | 49,205 t | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fertilizers n.e.c. — import quantity, Republic of Moldova or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 83,912 t against 1,910 t in Republic of Moldova as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fertilizers n.e.c. — import quantity between Republic of Moldova and Uganda?
- 82,002 t, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Moldova and Uganda?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Republic of Moldova and Uganda rank globally for fertilizers n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Republic of Moldova ranks 8th and Uganda ranks 10th of 13 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf