Saint Lucia vs Palestine: Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import quantity
Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Saint Lucia
- Palestine
How they compare
Saint Lucia currently reports 539.43 t against 504.05 t in Palestine, a difference of 35.38 t.
That makes Saint Lucia's figure about 1.1 times Palestine's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Saint Lucia ahead.
Saint Lucia ranks 139th and Palestine ranks 142nd of 203 countries.
Saint Lucia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saint Lucia | Palestine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,325 t | 101.99 t | 1,223 t | Saint Lucia |
| 2010s | 2,866 t | 289.58 t | 2,576 t | Saint Lucia |
| 2020s | 539.43 t | 377.77 t | 161.66 t | Saint Lucia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fertilizers n.e.c. — import quantity, Saint Lucia or Palestine?
- Saint Lucia, at 539.43 t against 504.05 t in Palestine as of 2020.
- What is the difference in fertilizers n.e.c. — import quantity between Saint Lucia and Palestine?
- 35.38 t, with Saint Lucia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Lucia and Palestine?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2020.
- How do Saint Lucia and Palestine rank globally for fertilizers n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Saint Lucia ranks 139th and Palestine ranks 142nd of 203 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf