Afghanistan vs Chad: Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import value
Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import value over time
- Afghanistan
- Chad
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 69.25 1000 USD against 56.55 1000 USD in Chad, a difference of 12.7 1000 USD.
That makes Afghanistan's figure about 1.2 times Chad's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Afghanistan ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 176th and Chad ranks 178th of 203 countries.
Afghanistan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Chad | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,435 1000 USD | 37.14 1000 USD | 1,398 1000 USD | Afghanistan |
| 2010s | 265.32 1000 USD | 158.11 1000 USD | 107.21 1000 USD | Afghanistan |
| 2020s | 450.95 1000 USD | 185.5 1000 USD | 265.45 1000 USD | Afghanistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fertilizers n.e.c. — import value, Afghanistan or Chad?
- Afghanistan, at 69.25 1000 USD against 56.55 1000 USD in Chad as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fertilizers n.e.c. — import value between Afghanistan and Chad?
- 12.7 1000 USD, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Chad?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do Afghanistan and Chad rank globally for fertilizers n.e.c. — import value?
- Afghanistan ranks 176th and Chad ranks 178th of 203 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf