Argentina vs Belarus: Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import value
Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import value over time
- Argentina
- Belarus
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 14,938 1000 USD against 14,629 1000 USD in Argentina, a difference of 309 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 58th and Belarus ranks 55th of 203 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 2 and Belarus in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Belarus | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 17,095 1000 USD | 2,591 1000 USD | 14,503 1000 USD | Argentina |
| 2010s | 12,073 1000 USD | 5,419 1000 USD | 6,654 1000 USD | Argentina |
| 2020s | 10,237 1000 USD | 11,859 1000 USD | 1,623 1000 USD | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fertilizers n.e.c. — import value, Argentina or Belarus?
- Belarus, at 14,938 1000 USD against 14,629 1000 USD in Argentina as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fertilizers n.e.c. — import value between Argentina and Belarus?
- 309 1000 USD, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Belarus?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Argentina and Belarus rank globally for fertilizers n.e.c. — import value?
- Argentina ranks 58th and Belarus ranks 55th of 203 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf