Armenia vs Luxembourg: Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import value
Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import value over time
- Armenia
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 2,777 1000 USD against 2,678 1000 USD in Luxembourg, a difference of 99 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Armenia ranks 111th and Luxembourg ranks 113th of 203 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 46.06 1000 USD | 1,768 1000 USD | 1,722 1000 USD | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 297.12 1000 USD | 1,584 1000 USD | 1,286 1000 USD | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 1,491 1000 USD | 2,209 1000 USD | 717.89 1000 USD | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fertilizers n.e.c. — import value, Armenia or Luxembourg?
- Armenia, at 2,777 1000 USD against 2,678 1000 USD in Luxembourg as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fertilizers n.e.c. — import value between Armenia and Luxembourg?
- 99 1000 USD, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Luxembourg?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Armenia and Luxembourg rank globally for fertilizers n.e.c. — import value?
- Armenia ranks 111th and Luxembourg ranks 113th of 203 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf