Austria vs Zimbabwe: Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import value
Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import value over time
- Austria
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 19,315 1000 USD against 18,342 1000 USD in Austria, a difference of 973 1000 USD.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Austria's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Austria ahead.
Austria ranks 50th and Zimbabwe ranks 49th of 203 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8,294 1000 USD | 10,308 1000 USD | 2,015 1000 USD | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 13,961 1000 USD | 293,659 1000 USD | 279,698 1000 USD | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 19,439 1000 USD | 14,849 1000 USD | 4,590 1000 USD | Austria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fertilizers n.e.c. — import value, Austria or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 19,315 1000 USD against 18,342 1000 USD in Austria as of 2023.
- What is the difference in fertilizers n.e.c. — import value between Austria and Zimbabwe?
- 973 1000 USD, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Zimbabwe?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Austria and Zimbabwe rank globally for fertilizers n.e.c. — import value?
- Austria ranks 50th and Zimbabwe ranks 49th of 203 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf