Bahamas vs New Caledonia: Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import value
Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import value over time
- Bahamas
- New Caledonia
How they compare
New Caledonia currently reports 603.57 1000 USD against 570.01 1000 USD in Bahamas, a difference of 33.56 1000 USD.
That makes New Caledonia's figure about 1.1 times Bahamas's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Bahamas ahead.
Bahamas ranks 143rd and New Caledonia ranks 142nd of 203 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 1 and New Caledonia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahamas | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 593.57 1000 USD | 425.24 1000 USD | 168.34 1000 USD | Bahamas |
| 2010s | 262.07 1000 USD | 612.55 1000 USD | 350.48 1000 USD | New Caledonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fertilizers n.e.c. — import value, Bahamas or New Caledonia?
- New Caledonia, at 603.57 1000 USD against 570.01 1000 USD in Bahamas as of 2015.
- What is the difference in fertilizers n.e.c. — import value between Bahamas and New Caledonia?
- 33.56 1000 USD, with New Caledonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and New Caledonia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2015.
- How do Bahamas and New Caledonia rank globally for fertilizers n.e.c. — import value?
- Bahamas ranks 143rd and New Caledonia ranks 142nd of 203 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf