Belgium vs Kazakhstan: Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import value
Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import value over time
- Belgium
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 11,133 1000 USD against 9,691 1000 USD in Belgium, a difference of 1,442 1000 USD.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.1 times Belgium's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 69th and Kazakhstan ranks 67th of 203 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 13,097 1000 USD | 606.04 1000 USD | 12,491 1000 USD | Belgium |
| 2010s | 18,405 1000 USD | 3,036 1000 USD | 15,369 1000 USD | Belgium |
| 2020s | 12,751 1000 USD | 10,906 1000 USD | 1,845 1000 USD | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fertilizers n.e.c. — import value, Belgium or Kazakhstan?
- Kazakhstan, at 11,133 1000 USD against 9,691 1000 USD in Belgium as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fertilizers n.e.c. — import value between Belgium and Kazakhstan?
- 1,442 1000 USD, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Kazakhstan?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Belgium and Kazakhstan rank globally for fertilizers n.e.c. — import value?
- Belgium ranks 69th and Kazakhstan ranks 67th of 203 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf