Chile vs Land Locked Developing Countries (excluding intra-trade): Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import value

Chile
55,716 1000 USD
in 2024
Land Locked Developing Countries (excluding intra-trade)
272,847 1000 USD
in 2024
Chile rank
12th
Land Locked Developing Countries (excluding intra-trade) rank
9th

Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import value over time

  • Chile
  • Land Locked Developing Countries (excluding intra-trade)
0500.0k1.0M1.5M2.0M200220132024

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (excluding intra-trade) currently reports 272,847 1000 USD against 55,716 1000 USD in Chile, a difference of 217,131 1000 USD.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (excluding intra-trade)'s figure about 4.9 times Chile's.

Across all 23 years both countries report, Land Locked Developing Countries (excluding intra-trade) has been ahead every year.

Chile ranks 12th and Land Locked Developing Countries (excluding intra-trade) ranks 9th of 190 countries.

Land Locked Developing Countries (excluding intra-trade) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Land Locked Developing Countries (excluding intra-trade) Difference Ahead
2000s 10,942 1000 USD 68,800 1000 USD 57,858 1000 USD Land Locked Developing Countries (excluding intra-trade)
2010s 33,171 1000 USD 552,789 1000 USD 519,618 1000 USD Land Locked Developing Countries (excluding intra-trade)
2020s 44,013 1000 USD 254,087 1000 USD 210,074 1000 USD Land Locked Developing Countries (excluding intra-trade)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fertilizers n.e.c. — import value, Chile or Land Locked Developing Countries (excluding intra-trade)?
Land Locked Developing Countries (excluding intra-trade), at 272,847 1000 USD against 55,716 1000 USD in Chile as of 2024.
What is the difference in fertilizers n.e.c. — import value between Chile and Land Locked Developing Countries (excluding intra-trade)?
217,131 1000 USD, with Land Locked Developing Countries (excluding intra-trade) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Land Locked Developing Countries (excluding intra-trade)?
23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
How do Chile and Land Locked Developing Countries (excluding intra-trade) rank globally for fertilizers n.e.c. — import value?
Chile ranks 12th and Land Locked Developing Countries (excluding intra-trade) ranks 9th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Land Locked Developing Countries (excluding intra-trade): Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 26 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/fertilizers-n-e-c-import-value/chile/land-locked-developing-countries-excluding-intra-trade/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/fertilizers-n-e-c-import-value/chile/land-locked-developing-countries-excluding-intra-trade/">Chile vs Land Locked Developing Countries (excluding intra-trade): Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import value
Unit
1000 USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
235 places, 5,005 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf