Congo vs Suriname: Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import value
Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import value over time
- Congo
- Suriname
How they compare
Congo currently reports 429.3 1000 USD against 382.52 1000 USD in Suriname, a difference of 46.78 1000 USD.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Suriname's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Suriname ahead.
Congo ranks 148th and Suriname ranks 151st of 203 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 474.94 1000 USD | 236.2 1000 USD | 238.74 1000 USD | Congo |
| 2010s | 337.18 1000 USD | 226.76 1000 USD | 110.42 1000 USD | Congo |
| 2020s | 347.49 1000 USD | 316.7 1000 USD | 30.79 1000 USD | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fertilizers n.e.c. — import value, Congo or Suriname?
- Congo, at 429.3 1000 USD against 382.52 1000 USD in Suriname as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fertilizers n.e.c. — import value between Congo and Suriname?
- 46.78 1000 USD, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Suriname?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2024.
- How do Congo and Suriname rank globally for fertilizers n.e.c. — import value?
- Congo ranks 148th and Suriname ranks 151st of 203 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf