Czechia vs Kazakhstan: Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import value
Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import value over time
- Czechia
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 12,227 1000 USD against 11,133 1000 USD in Kazakhstan, a difference of 1,094 1000 USD.
That makes Czechia's figure about 1.1 times Kazakhstan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Czechia ahead.
Czechia ranks 65th and Kazakhstan ranks 67th of 203 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,431 1000 USD | 606.04 1000 USD | 1,825 1000 USD | Czechia |
| 2010s | 8,217 1000 USD | 3,036 1000 USD | 5,181 1000 USD | Czechia |
| 2020s | 12,357 1000 USD | 10,906 1000 USD | 1,452 1000 USD | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fertilizers n.e.c. — import value, Czechia or Kazakhstan?
- Czechia, at 12,227 1000 USD against 11,133 1000 USD in Kazakhstan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fertilizers n.e.c. — import value between Czechia and Kazakhstan?
- 1,094 1000 USD, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Kazakhstan?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Czechia and Kazakhstan rank globally for fertilizers n.e.c. — import value?
- Czechia ranks 65th and Kazakhstan ranks 67th of 203 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf