Eswatini vs Kyrgyzstan: Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import value
Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import value over time
- Eswatini
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 1,723 1000 USD against 1,646 1000 USD in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 77 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 121st and Kyrgyzstan ranks 122nd of 203 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 2 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4,690 1000 USD | 231.63 1000 USD | 4,459 1000 USD | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 714.58 1000 USD | 556.16 1000 USD | 158.41 1000 USD | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 1,322 1000 USD | 2,073 1000 USD | 751.19 1000 USD | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fertilizers n.e.c. — import value, Eswatini or Kyrgyzstan?
- Eswatini, at 1,723 1000 USD against 1,646 1000 USD in Kyrgyzstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in fertilizers n.e.c. — import value between Eswatini and Kyrgyzstan?
- 77 1000 USD, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Kyrgyzstan?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Eswatini and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for fertilizers n.e.c. — import value?
- Eswatini ranks 121st and Kyrgyzstan ranks 122nd of 203 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf