Eswatini vs Singapore: Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import value
Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import value over time
- Eswatini
- Singapore
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 1,750 1000 USD against 1,723 1000 USD in Eswatini, a difference of 27 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 121st and Singapore ranks 120th of 203 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 2 and Singapore in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4,690 1000 USD | 3,423 1000 USD | 1,267 1000 USD | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 714.58 1000 USD | 1,493 1000 USD | 778.49 1000 USD | Singapore |
| 2020s | 1,322 1000 USD | 1,301 1000 USD | 20.46 1000 USD | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fertilizers n.e.c. — import value, Eswatini or Singapore?
- Singapore, at 1,750 1000 USD against 1,723 1000 USD in Eswatini as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fertilizers n.e.c. — import value between Eswatini and Singapore?
- 27 1000 USD, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Singapore?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Eswatini and Singapore rank globally for fertilizers n.e.c. — import value?
- Eswatini ranks 121st and Singapore ranks 120th of 203 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf