Guatemala vs Panama: Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import value
Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import value over time
- Guatemala
- Panama
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 30,663 1000 USD against 25,912 1000 USD in Panama, a difference of 4,751 1000 USD.
That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.2 times Panama's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Panama ahead.
Guatemala ranks 34th and Panama ranks 37th of 203 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 2 and Panama in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,569 1000 USD | 9,326 1000 USD | 7,757 1000 USD | Panama |
| 2010s | 12,335 1000 USD | 8,648 1000 USD | 3,687 1000 USD | Guatemala |
| 2020s | 24,384 1000 USD | 18,267 1000 USD | 6,117 1000 USD | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fertilizers n.e.c. — import value, Guatemala or Panama?
- Guatemala, at 30,663 1000 USD against 25,912 1000 USD in Panama as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fertilizers n.e.c. — import value between Guatemala and Panama?
- 4,751 1000 USD, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Panama?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Guatemala and Panama rank globally for fertilizers n.e.c. — import value?
- Guatemala ranks 34th and Panama ranks 37th of 203 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf