Jordan vs Luxembourg: Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import value
Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import value over time
- Jordan
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 2,678 1000 USD against 2,131 1000 USD in Jordan, a difference of 547 1000 USD.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.3 times Jordan's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Jordan ahead.
Jordan ranks 107th and Luxembourg ranks 104th of 190 countries.
Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4,616 1000 USD | 1,768 1000 USD | 2,848 1000 USD | Jordan |
| 2010s | 3,448 1000 USD | 1,584 1000 USD | 1,864 1000 USD | Jordan |
| 2020s | 2,453 1000 USD | 2,209 1000 USD | 244.03 1000 USD | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fertilizers n.e.c. — import value, Jordan or Luxembourg?
- Luxembourg, at 2,678 1000 USD against 2,131 1000 USD in Jordan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fertilizers n.e.c. — import value between Jordan and Luxembourg?
- 547 1000 USD, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Luxembourg?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Jordan and Luxembourg rank globally for fertilizers n.e.c. — import value?
- Jordan ranks 107th and Luxembourg ranks 104th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf