Liberia vs New Caledonia: Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import value
Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import value over time
- Liberia
- New Caledonia
How they compare
Liberia currently reports 676.62 1000 USD against 603.57 1000 USD in New Caledonia, a difference of 73.05 1000 USD.
That makes Liberia's figure about 1.1 times New Caledonia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was New Caledonia ahead.
Liberia ranks 139th and New Caledonia ranks 142nd of 203 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Liberia averaged higher in 1 and New Caledonia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Liberia | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18.47 1000 USD | 415.04 1000 USD | 396.56 1000 USD | New Caledonia |
| 2010s | 1,999 1000 USD | 612.55 1000 USD | 1,386 1000 USD | Liberia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fertilizers n.e.c. — import value, Liberia or New Caledonia?
- Liberia, at 676.62 1000 USD against 603.57 1000 USD in New Caledonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in fertilizers n.e.c. — import value between Liberia and New Caledonia?
- 73.05 1000 USD, with Liberia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Liberia and New Caledonia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2015.
- How do Liberia and New Caledonia rank globally for fertilizers n.e.c. — import value?
- Liberia ranks 139th and New Caledonia ranks 142nd of 203 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf