Madagascar vs Tunisia: Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import value
Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import value over time
- Madagascar
- Tunisia
How they compare
Madagascar currently reports 8,632 1000 USD against 7,963 1000 USD in Tunisia, a difference of 669 1000 USD.
That makes Madagascar's figure about 1.1 times Tunisia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Tunisia ahead.
Madagascar ranks 74th and Tunisia ranks 76th of 203 countries.
Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Madagascar | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 159.73 1000 USD | 2,326 1000 USD | 2,166 1000 USD | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 1,431 1000 USD | 4,419 1000 USD | 2,988 1000 USD | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 3,503 1000 USD | 7,277 1000 USD | 3,774 1000 USD | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fertilizers n.e.c. — import value, Madagascar or Tunisia?
- Madagascar, at 8,632 1000 USD against 7,963 1000 USD in Tunisia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fertilizers n.e.c. — import value between Madagascar and Tunisia?
- 669 1000 USD, with Madagascar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Tunisia?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Madagascar and Tunisia rank globally for fertilizers n.e.c. — import value?
- Madagascar ranks 74th and Tunisia ranks 76th of 203 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf