Malta vs Mauritania: Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import value
Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import value over time
- Malta
- Mauritania
How they compare
Mauritania currently reports 534.57 1000 USD against 435.05 1000 USD in Malta, a difference of 99.52 1000 USD.
That makes Mauritania's figure about 1.2 times Malta's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Malta ahead.
Malta ranks 147th and Mauritania ranks 144th of 203 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 2 and Mauritania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 489.98 1000 USD | 22.01 1000 USD | 467.97 1000 USD | Malta |
| 2010s | 202.08 1000 USD | 20.15 1000 USD | 181.93 1000 USD | Malta |
| 2020s | 343.99 1000 USD | 1,638 1000 USD | 1,294 1000 USD | Mauritania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fertilizers n.e.c. — import value, Malta or Mauritania?
- Mauritania, at 534.57 1000 USD against 435.05 1000 USD in Malta as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fertilizers n.e.c. — import value between Malta and Mauritania?
- 99.52 1000 USD, with Mauritania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Mauritania?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Malta and Mauritania rank globally for fertilizers n.e.c. — import value?
- Malta ranks 147th and Mauritania ranks 144th of 203 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf