Mongolia vs Palestine: Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import value
Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import value over time
- Mongolia
- Palestine
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 1,329 1000 USD against 1,324 1000 USD in Palestine, a difference of 5 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Palestine ahead.
Mongolia ranks 116th and Palestine ranks 117th of 190 countries.
Palestine has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Palestine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8.04 1000 USD | 152.39 1000 USD | 144.35 1000 USD | Palestine |
| 2010s | 280.36 1000 USD | 569.33 1000 USD | 288.96 1000 USD | Palestine |
| 2020s | 1,063 1000 USD | 1,229 1000 USD | 165.97 1000 USD | Palestine |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fertilizers n.e.c. — import value, Mongolia or Palestine?
- Mongolia, at 1,329 1000 USD against 1,324 1000 USD in Palestine as of 2023.
- What is the difference in fertilizers n.e.c. — import value between Mongolia and Palestine?
- 5 1000 USD, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Palestine?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
- How do Mongolia and Palestine rank globally for fertilizers n.e.c. — import value?
- Mongolia ranks 116th and Palestine ranks 117th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Fertilizers n.e.c. — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf