Bulgaria vs Luxembourg: Fertilizers n.e.c. — Production

Bulgaria
324 t
in 2023
Luxembourg
0 t
in 2024
Bulgaria rank
15th
Luxembourg rank
17th

Fertilizers n.e.c. — Production over time

  • Bulgaria
  • Luxembourg
0200400600201320182024

How they compare

Bulgaria currently reports 324 t against 0 t in Luxembourg, a difference of 324 t.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Bulgaria has been ahead every year.

Bulgaria ranks 15th and Luxembourg ranks 17th of 27 countries.

Bulgaria has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bulgaria Luxembourg Difference Ahead
2010s 442 t 0 t 442 t Bulgaria
2020s 355.25 t 0 t 355.25 t Bulgaria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fertilizers n.e.c. — production, Bulgaria or Luxembourg?
Bulgaria, at 324 t against 0 t in Luxembourg as of 2023.
What is the difference in fertilizers n.e.c. — production between Bulgaria and Luxembourg?
324 t, with Bulgaria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bulgaria and Luxembourg?
6 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2023.
How do Bulgaria and Luxembourg rank globally for fertilizers n.e.c. — production?
Bulgaria ranks 15th and Luxembourg ranks 17th of 27 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Fertilizers n.e.c. — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Fertilizers n.e.c. — Production
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
27 places, 220 data points, 2012–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf