Barbados vs Cayman Islands: Fibreboard — Import quantity, per capita
Barbados
0.0027 m3 per person
in 2024
Cayman Islands
0.0025 m3 per person
in 2024
Barbados rank
88th
Cayman Islands rank
91st
Fibreboard — Import quantity, per capita over time
- Barbados
- Cayman Islands
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 0.0027 m3 per person against 0.0025 m3 per person in Cayman Islands, a difference of 0.0002 m3 per person.
That makes Barbados's figure about 1.1 times Cayman Islands's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Barbados ahead.
Barbados ranks 88th and Cayman Islands ranks 91st of 177 countries.
Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Cayman Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.003 m3 per person | 0.0004 m3 per person | 0.0025 m3 per person | Barbados |
| 2020s | 0.0041 m3 per person | 0.0028 m3 per person | 0.0012 m3 per person | Barbados |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fibreboard — import quantity, per capita, Barbados or Cayman Islands?
- Barbados, at 0.0027 m3 per person against 0.0025 m3 per person in Cayman Islands as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fibreboard — import quantity, per capita between Barbados and Cayman Islands?
- 0.0002 m3 per person, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Cayman Islands?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2024.
- How do Barbados and Cayman Islands rank globally for fibreboard — import quantity, per capita?
- Barbados ranks 88th and Cayman Islands ranks 91st of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Fibreboard — Import quantity, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Fibreboard — Import quantity divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.