Chile vs New Zealand: Fibreboard — Import quantity, per capita
Chile
0.0044 m3 per person
in 2024
New Zealand
0.0044 m3 per person
in 2024
Chile rank
72nd
New Zealand rank
73rd
Fibreboard — Import quantity, per capita over time
- Chile
- New Zealand
How they compare
Chile currently reports 0.0044 m3 per person against 0.0044 m3 per person in New Zealand, a difference of 0 m3 per person.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was New Zealand ahead.
Chile ranks 72nd and New Zealand ranks 73rd of 177 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0001 m3 per person | 0.0014 m3 per person | 0.0013 m3 per person | New Zealand |
| 2000s | 0.0014 m3 per person | 0.0021 m3 per person | 0.0007 m3 per person | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 0.0027 m3 per person | 0.004 m3 per person | 0.0012 m3 per person | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 0.0055 m3 per person | 0.0057 m3 per person | 0.0002 m3 per person | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fibreboard — import quantity, per capita, Chile or New Zealand?
- Chile, at 0.0044 m3 per person against 0.0044 m3 per person in New Zealand as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fibreboard — import quantity, per capita between Chile and New Zealand?
- 0 m3 per person, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and New Zealand?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Chile and New Zealand rank globally for fibreboard — import quantity, per capita?
- Chile ranks 72nd and New Zealand ranks 73rd of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Fibreboard — Import quantity, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Fibreboard — Import quantity divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.