Czechia vs Latvia: Fibreboard — Import quantity, per capita
Czechia
0.0203 m3 per person
in 2024
Latvia
0.0201 m3 per person
in 2024
Czechia rank
24th
Latvia rank
25th
Fibreboard — Import quantity, per capita over time
- Czechia
- Latvia
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 0.0203 m3 per person against 0.0201 m3 per person in Latvia, a difference of 0.0002 m3 per person.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Czechia ahead.
Czechia ranks 24th and Latvia ranks 25th of 177 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 3 and Latvia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0035 m3 per person | 0.0011 m3 per person | 0.0024 m3 per person | Czechia |
| 2000s | 0.0219 m3 per person | 0.0084 m3 per person | 0.0135 m3 per person | Czechia |
| 2010s | 0.02 m3 per person | 0.0173 m3 per person | 0.0027 m3 per person | Czechia |
| 2020s | 0.0189 m3 per person | 0.0286 m3 per person | 0.0097 m3 per person | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fibreboard — import quantity, per capita, Czechia or Latvia?
- Czechia, at 0.0203 m3 per person against 0.0201 m3 per person in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fibreboard — import quantity, per capita between Czechia and Latvia?
- 0.0002 m3 per person, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Latvia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
- How do Czechia and Latvia rank globally for fibreboard — import quantity, per capita?
- Czechia ranks 24th and Latvia ranks 25th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Fibreboard — Import quantity, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Fibreboard — Import quantity divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.