Gambia vs Thailand: Fibreboard — Import quantity, per capita
Gambia
0.0006 m3 per person
in 2024
Thailand
0.0006 m3 per person
in 2024
Gambia rank
128th
Thailand rank
131st
Fibreboard — Import quantity, per capita over time
- Gambia
- Thailand
How they compare
Gambia currently reports 0.0006 m3 per person against 0.0006 m3 per person in Thailand, a difference of 0 m3 per person.
That makes Gambia's figure about 1.1 times Thailand's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Gambia ahead.
Gambia ranks 128th and Thailand ranks 131st of 177 countries.
Gambia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gambia | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0007 m3 per person | 0.0003 m3 per person | 0.0005 m3 per person | Gambia |
| 2000s | 0.0008 m3 per person | 0.0004 m3 per person | 0.0004 m3 per person | Gambia |
| 2010s | 0.0008 m3 per person | 0.0003 m3 per person | 0.0005 m3 per person | Gambia |
| 2020s | 0.0011 m3 per person | 0.0004 m3 per person | 0.0007 m3 per person | Gambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fibreboard — import quantity, per capita, Gambia or Thailand?
- Gambia, at 0.0006 m3 per person against 0.0006 m3 per person in Thailand as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fibreboard — import quantity, per capita between Gambia and Thailand?
- 0 m3 per person, with Gambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Thailand?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Gambia and Thailand rank globally for fibreboard — import quantity, per capita?
- Gambia ranks 128th and Thailand ranks 131st of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Fibreboard — Import quantity, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Fibreboard — Import quantity divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.