Ireland vs Latvia: Fibreboard — Import quantity, per capita
Ireland
0.0197 m3 per person
in 2024
Latvia
0.0201 m3 per person
in 2024
Ireland rank
26th
Latvia rank
25th
Fibreboard — Import quantity, per capita over time
- Ireland
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0.0201 m3 per person against 0.0197 m3 per person in Ireland, a difference of 0.0004 m3 per person.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Ireland ahead.
Ireland ranks 26th and Latvia ranks 25th of 177 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ireland averaged higher in 2 and Latvia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ireland | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0124 m3 per person | 0.0009 m3 per person | 0.0115 m3 per person | Ireland |
| 2000s | 0.0161 m3 per person | 0.0084 m3 per person | 0.0078 m3 per person | Ireland |
| 2010s | 0.0162 m3 per person | 0.0173 m3 per person | 0.0011 m3 per person | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0.0228 m3 per person | 0.0286 m3 per person | 0.0058 m3 per person | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fibreboard — import quantity, per capita, Ireland or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 0.0201 m3 per person against 0.0197 m3 per person in Ireland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fibreboard — import quantity, per capita between Ireland and Latvia?
- 0.0004 m3 per person, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ireland and Latvia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Ireland and Latvia rank globally for fibreboard — import quantity, per capita?
- Ireland ranks 26th and Latvia ranks 25th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Fibreboard — Import quantity, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Fibreboard — Import quantity divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.