Portugal vs Qatar: Fibreboard — Import quantity, per capita
Portugal
0.025 m3 per person
in 2024
Qatar
0.0292 m3 per person
in 2024
Portugal rank
15th
Qatar rank
12th
Fibreboard — Import quantity, per capita over time
- Portugal
- Qatar
How they compare
Qatar currently reports 0.0292 m3 per person against 0.025 m3 per person in Portugal, a difference of 0.0042 m3 per person.
That makes Qatar's figure about 1.2 times Portugal's.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Portugal ahead.
Portugal ranks 15th and Qatar ranks 12th of 177 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Portugal averaged higher in 2 and Qatar in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Portugal | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.005 m3 per person | 0.0074 m3 per person | 0.0024 m3 per person | Qatar |
| 2000s | 0.0168 m3 per person | 0.0245 m3 per person | 0.0077 m3 per person | Qatar |
| 2010s | 0.0282 m3 per person | 0.0181 m3 per person | 0.0101 m3 per person | Portugal |
| 2020s | 0.0296 m3 per person | 0.0262 m3 per person | 0.0034 m3 per person | Portugal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fibreboard — import quantity, per capita, Portugal or Qatar?
- Qatar, at 0.0292 m3 per person against 0.025 m3 per person in Portugal as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fibreboard — import quantity, per capita between Portugal and Qatar?
- 0.0042 m3 per person, with Qatar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Portugal and Qatar?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Portugal and Qatar rank globally for fibreboard — import quantity, per capita?
- Portugal ranks 15th and Qatar ranks 12th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Fibreboard — Import quantity, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Fibreboard — Import quantity divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.