Tunisia vs Uruguay: Fibreboard — Import quantity, per capita
Tunisia
0.0159 m3 per person
in 2024
Uruguay
0.0158 m3 per person
in 2024
Tunisia rank
34th
Uruguay rank
35th
Fibreboard — Import quantity, per capita over time
- Tunisia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 0.0159 m3 per person against 0.0158 m3 per person in Uruguay, a difference of 0.0001 m3 per person.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Uruguay ahead.
Tunisia ranks 34th and Uruguay ranks 35th of 177 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Tunisia averaged higher in 2 and Uruguay in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Tunisia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0001 m3 per person | 0.0011 m3 per person | 0.001 m3 per person | Uruguay |
| 2000s | 0.0036 m3 per person | 0.0054 m3 per person | 0.0018 m3 per person | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 0.0131 m3 per person | 0.0093 m3 per person | 0.0038 m3 per person | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 0.0162 m3 per person | 0.0121 m3 per person | 0.0041 m3 per person | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fibreboard — import quantity, per capita, Tunisia or Uruguay?
- Tunisia, at 0.0159 m3 per person against 0.0158 m3 per person in Uruguay as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fibreboard — import quantity, per capita between Tunisia and Uruguay?
- 0.0001 m3 per person, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Tunisia and Uruguay?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Tunisia and Uruguay rank globally for fibreboard — import quantity, per capita?
- Tunisia ranks 34th and Uruguay ranks 35th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Fibreboard — Import quantity, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Fibreboard — Import quantity divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.