Bhutan vs China: Fibreboard — Import value, per square kilometre
Bhutan
0.01 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
China
0.0102 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Bhutan rank
146th
China rank
145th
Fibreboard — Import value, per square kilometre over time
- Bhutan
- China
How they compare
China currently reports 0.0102 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.01 1000 USD per square kilometre in Bhutan, a difference of 0.0002 1000 USD per square kilometre.
Across all 14 years both countries report, China has been ahead every year.
Bhutan ranks 146th and China ranks 145th of 177 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0046 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.0189 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.0143 1000 USD per square kilometre | China |
| 2020s | 0.006 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.0167 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.0107 1000 USD per square kilometre | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fibreboard — import value, per square kilometre, Bhutan or China?
- China, at 0.0102 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.01 1000 USD per square kilometre in Bhutan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in fibreboard — import value, per square kilometre between Bhutan and China?
- 0.0002 1000 USD per square kilometre, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and China?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Bhutan and China rank globally for fibreboard — import value, per square kilometre?
- Bhutan ranks 146th and China ranks 145th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Fibreboard — Import value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Fibreboard — Import value divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.