Bulgaria vs Ecuador: Food and Accommodation Away From Home (FAAFH) — Agriculture, Forestry
Food and Accommodation Away From Home (FAAFH) — Agriculture, Forestry over time
- Bulgaria
- Ecuador
How they compare
Bulgaria currently reports 25.25 million SLC against 20.27 million SLC in Ecuador, a difference of 4.98 million SLC.
That makes Bulgaria's figure about 1.2 times Ecuador's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.
Bulgaria ranks 51st and Ecuador ranks 52nd of 60 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bulgaria | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18.05 million SLC | 23.73 million SLC | 5.68 million SLC | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 20.06 million SLC | 26.68 million SLC | 6.61 million SLC | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher food and accommodation away from home (faafh) — agriculture, forestry, Bulgaria or Ecuador?
- Bulgaria, at 25.25 million SLC against 20.27 million SLC in Ecuador as of 2015.
- What is the difference in food and accommodation away from home (faafh) — agriculture, forestry between Bulgaria and Ecuador?
- 4.98 million SLC, with Bulgaria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bulgaria and Ecuador?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2015.
- How do Bulgaria and Ecuador rank globally for food and accommodation away from home (faafh) — agriculture, forestry?
- Bulgaria ranks 51st and Ecuador ranks 52nd of 60 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food and Accommodation Away From Home (FAAFH) — Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Import — Value SLC, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This domain contains data on three food value measures, namely: (1) Food At Home (FAH); (2) Food and Tobacco at Home (FTAH); (3) Food and Accommodation Away From Home (FAAFH), disaggregated by four primary factors (Operating Surplus, Labor, Taxes, Imports) and by five food value chain industries (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; Manufacture of food, beverages and tobacco products; Transportation and storage; Wholesale and retail trade; Accommodation and food service activities). The three food value measures differ for the bundle of goods and services they account for. In particular, the FAH refers to domestic expenditures of personal consumption for food consumed at home, at purchaser prices. The FTAH measure is similar in its target, but it refers to a broader set of economic goods, inclusive of tobacco, as food and tobacco expenditures are not always separable in the original data. On the other side, the FAAFH refers to domestic expenditures of personal consumption for food consumed away from home (e.g. in restaurants), at purchaser prices, and it also includes expenditures for accommodation in all the cases where the two types of expenditures were not separable in the original data. The values of industry decomposition measure the food production value-added distribution across different industries and factors involved in the agri-food value chain. All these estimates are based on Leontief Input Ouput modeling and Industry reduction method. The Food Value Chain domain aims to supply informaiton relevant for the SDG 12 - sustainable consumption and production patterns, SDG 2 - zero hunger and SDG 1 - no poverty, that constitue guiding SDGs in the FAO Strategic Framework 2022-2031 and its better production pillar. More in general they may inform national, regional and global food policy, including measures in the World Food Summit framework. Data are collected from national Supply and Use Tables (SUTs) and Industry by Industry Input Output tables (IOTs), via OECD database or NSOs. All input data are in line with the System of National Accounts (SNA) and main international classifications and standards related to environmental-economic accounting (respectively the System of Environmental-Economic Accounting for Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, SEEA AFF, and the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities, ISIC).