Croatia vs Zimbabwe: Forest area as a proportion of total land area
Croatia
34.8%
in 2025
Zimbabwe
35.6%
in 2025
Croatia rank
95th
Zimbabwe rank
92nd
Forest area as a proportion of total land area over time
- Croatia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 35.6% against 34.8% in Croatia, a difference of 0.8%.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Croatia ranks 95th and Zimbabwe ranks 92nd of 219 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 33.1% | 43.2% | 10.1% | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 33.7% | 40.5% | 6.8% | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 34.3% | 37.4% | 3.0% | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 34.7% | 35.9% | 1.2% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest area as a proportion of total land area, Croatia or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 35.6% against 34.8% in Croatia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forest area as a proportion of total land area between Croatia and Zimbabwe?
- 0.8%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Zimbabwe?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Croatia and Zimbabwe rank globally for forest area as a proportion of total land area?
- Croatia ranks 95th and Zimbabwe ranks 92nd of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Forest area as a proportion of total land area (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.