Micronesia vs Pitcairn: Forest area as a proportion of total land area
Micronesia
53.6%
in 2025
Pitcairn
78.5%
in 2025
Micronesia rank
9th
Pitcairn rank
9th
Forest area as a proportion of total land area over time
- Micronesia
- Pitcairn
How they compare
Pitcairn currently reports 78.5% against 53.6% in Micronesia, a difference of 24.9%.
That makes Pitcairn's figure about 1.5 times Micronesia's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Pitcairn has been ahead every year.
Micronesia ranks 9th and Pitcairn ranks 9th of 23 regions.
Pitcairn has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Micronesia | Pitcairn | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 49.4% | 78.5% | 29.1% | Pitcairn |
| 2000s | 49.9% | 78.5% | 28.6% | Pitcairn |
| 2010s | 51.7% | 78.5% | 26.8% | Pitcairn |
| 2020s | 53.5% | 78.5% | 25.0% | Pitcairn |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest area as a proportion of total land area, Micronesia or Pitcairn?
- Pitcairn, at 78.5% against 53.6% in Micronesia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forest area as a proportion of total land area between Micronesia and Pitcairn?
- 24.9%, with Pitcairn ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia and Pitcairn?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Micronesia and Pitcairn rank globally for forest area as a proportion of total land area?
- Micronesia ranks 9th and Pitcairn ranks 9th of 23 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Forest area as a proportion of total land area (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.