Pitcairn vs Solomon Islands: Forest area as a proportion of total land area
Pitcairn
78.5%
in 2025
Solomon Islands
89.8%
in 2025
Pitcairn rank
9th
Solomon Islands rank
6th
Forest area as a proportion of total land area over time
- Pitcairn
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Solomon Islands currently reports 89.8% against 78.5% in Pitcairn, a difference of 11.3%.
That makes Solomon Islands's figure about 1.1 times Pitcairn's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Solomon Islands has been ahead every year.
Pitcairn ranks 9th and Solomon Islands ranks 6th of 219 countries.
Solomon Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Pitcairn | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 78.5% | 90.7% | 12.2% | Solomon Islands |
| 2000s | 78.5% | 90.5% | 12.0% | Solomon Islands |
| 2010s | 78.5% | 90.1% | 11.6% | Solomon Islands |
| 2020s | 78.5% | 89.9% | 11.4% | Solomon Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest area as a proportion of total land area, Pitcairn or Solomon Islands?
- Solomon Islands, at 89.8% against 78.5% in Pitcairn as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forest area as a proportion of total land area between Pitcairn and Solomon Islands?
- 11.3%, with Solomon Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Pitcairn and Solomon Islands?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Pitcairn and Solomon Islands rank globally for forest area as a proportion of total land area?
- Pitcairn ranks 9th and Solomon Islands ranks 6th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Forest area as a proportion of total land area (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.