Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) vs Latvia: Forest area certified under an independently verified certification

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
1,233 ha th
in 2024
Latvia
1,779 ha th
in 2024
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) rank
26th
Latvia rank
28th

Forest area certified under an independently verified certification over time

  • Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
  • Latvia
01.0k2.0k3.0k199020072024

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 1,779 ha th against 1,233 ha th in Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs), a difference of 546 ha th.

That makes Latvia's figure about 1.4 times Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 14 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Latvia ahead.

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 26th and Latvia ranks 28th of 40 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s 0 ha th 0 ha th 0 ha th
2000s 1,043 ha th 843.53 ha th 199.43 ha th Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
2010s 1,261 ha th 1,950 ha th 689.69 ha th Latvia
2020s 1,303 ha th 1,895 ha th 592.69 ha th Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest area certified under an independently verified certification, Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) or Latvia?
Latvia, at 1,779 ha th against 1,233 ha th in Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) as of 2024.
What is the difference in forest area certified under an independently verified certification between Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) and Latvia?
546 ha th, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) and Latvia?
14 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) and Latvia rank globally for forest area certified under an independently verified certification?
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 26th and Latvia ranks 28th of 40 groups.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Forest area certified under an independently verified certification scheme (thousands of hectares). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) vs Latvia: Forest area certified under an independently verified certification. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 16 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forest-area-certified-under-an-independently-verified-certification-scheme-thousands-of/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forest-area-certified-under-an-independently-verified-certification-scheme-thousands-of/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/latvia/">Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) vs Latvia: Forest area certified under an independently verified certification</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest area certified under an independently verified certification scheme (thousands of hectares)
Unit
ha th
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
287 places, 4,018 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed