Azerbaijan vs Fiji: Forest area
Azerbaijan
1.21 million hectares
in 2025
Fiji
1.14 million hectares
in 2025
Azerbaijan rank
122nd
Fiji rank
124th
Forest area over time
- Azerbaijan
- Fiji
How they compare
Azerbaijan currently reports 1.21 million hectares against 1.14 million hectares in Fiji, a difference of 77,060 hectares.
That makes Azerbaijan's figure about 1.1 times Fiji's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Azerbaijan ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 122nd and Fiji ranks 124th of 235 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 1 and Fiji in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Fiji | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 963,856 hectares | 969,741 hectares | 5,885 hectares | Fiji |
| 2000s | 1.01 million hectares | 1.03 million hectares | 26,166 hectares | Fiji |
| 2010s | 1.08 million hectares | 1.09 million hectares | 7,031 hectares | Fiji |
| 2020s | 1.19 million hectares | 1.13 million hectares | 62,405 hectares | Azerbaijan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest area, Azerbaijan or Fiji?
- Azerbaijan, at 1.21 million hectares against 1.14 million hectares in Fiji as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forest area between Azerbaijan and Fiji?
- 77,060 hectares, with Azerbaijan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Fiji?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Azerbaijan and Fiji rank globally for forest area?
- Azerbaijan ranks 122nd and Fiji ranks 124th of 235 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Forest area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forest area is land under natural or planted stands of trees of at least 5 meters in situ, whether productive or not, and excludes tree stands in agricultural production systems.