Botswana vs Chile: Forest area
Botswana
15.73 million hectares
in 2025
Chile
18.16 million hectares
in 2025
Botswana rank
40th
Chile rank
37th
Forest area over time
- Botswana
- Chile
How they compare
Chile currently reports 18.16 million hectares against 15.73 million hectares in Botswana, a difference of 2.43 million hectares.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.2 times Botswana's.
Across all 36 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.
Botswana ranks 40th and Chile ranks 37th of 235 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Chile | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 15.73 million hectares | 17.09 million hectares | 1.36 million hectares | Chile |
| 2000s | 15.73 million hectares | 17.70 million hectares | 1.97 million hectares | Chile |
| 2010s | 15.73 million hectares | 18.16 million hectares | 2.43 million hectares | Chile |
| 2020s | 15.73 million hectares | 18.17 million hectares | 2.44 million hectares | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest area, Botswana or Chile?
- Chile, at 18.16 million hectares against 15.73 million hectares in Botswana as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forest area between Botswana and Chile?
- 2.43 million hectares, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Chile?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Botswana and Chile rank globally for forest area?
- Botswana ranks 40th and Chile ranks 37th of 235 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Forest area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forest area is land under natural or planted stands of trees of at least 5 meters in situ, whether productive or not, and excludes tree stands in agricultural production systems.